Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/252/2025 of STATE OF NAGALAND AND 8 ORS Vs SMTI TONGPHE on 22 September 2026
GAHC020008932025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/252/2025 STATE OF NAGALAND AND 8 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO TH GOVT. OF NAGALAND NAGALAND KOHIMA 2: THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF
GAHC020008932025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/252/2025
STATE OF NAGALAND AND 8 ORS
THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO TH GOVT. OF NAGALAND
NAGALAND KOHIMA
2: THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
P AND AR DEPARTMENT
NAGALAND KOHIMA
3: THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER
TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
NAGALAND KOHIMA
4: THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
GOVT. OF NAGALAND
WORKS AND HOUSING DEPT. NAGALAND KOHIMA
5: THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF
NPWD (ROADS AND BRIDGES)
NAGALAND KOHIMA
6: THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PWD (ROADS AND BRIDGES)
NAGALAND KOHIMA
7: THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD (ROADS AND BRIDGES)
NAGALAND KOHIMA
8: THE TREASURY OFFICER
TUENSANG
NAGALAND
9: THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
NAGALAND KOHIMA
VERSUS
SMTI TONGPHE
W/O LATE KAOHAI
PANGSHA OLD VILLAGE
NOKLAK DISTRICT
NAGALAND
------------
For the Applicant(s) : Mr. V. Zhimomi, Advocate For the Respondent(s) : Ms. V. Kiso, Advocate BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
HONBLE MRS JUSTICE HELEN DAWNGLIANI
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 23.09.2026 (D.Baruah, J.)
This is an application seeking stay of the order dated 21.01.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 145/2024 which is impugned in the accompanying Appeal.
2. Taking into account that we have admitted the accompanying Appeal and further that we are prima facie of the opinion that the impugned order may require interference, we deem it appropriate to stay the operation of the impugned order dated 21.01.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 145/2024 during the pendency of the accompanying Appeal.
3. Accordingly, the operation of the order dated 21.01.2025 passed in WP(C) No. 145/2024 shall remain stayed during the pendency of the accompanying Appeal.
4. With the above, I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant