Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/144/2026 of SMTI. HONGLIN Vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 9 ORS on 17 September 2026
GAHC020006912026 2026:GAU-NL:482 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/144/2026 SMTI. HONGLIN W/O LATE P. PHIU @ PHIU KHIAM, NOKYAN VILLAGE, NOKLAK, NAGALAND VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 9 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF
GAHC020006912026
2026:GAU-NL:482
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WP(C)/144/2026
SMTI. HONGLIN
W/O LATE P. PHIU @ PHIU KHIAM, NOKYAN VILLAGE, NOKLAK, NAGALAND
VERSUS
THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 9 ORS
THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY (P AND AR)
TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
3:THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY (W AND H)
TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
WORKS AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
5:THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF
NAGALAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ( HOUSING)
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
7:THE EXECUTUVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (HOUSING)
NOKLAK
NAGALAND
8:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT (HOUSING)
TUENSANG
NAGALAND
9:THE TREASURY OFFICER
TUENSANG
NAGALAND
10:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
NAGALAND
KOHIM
Advocate for the Petitioner : I. IMTI LONGCHAR, THSACHOPA TS,MOANUKSUNG
KICHU,OBANGNENLA LONGCHAR,W YAKAP KONYAK,VIKHONO KISO
Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 18-09-2026
1. Mr. W. Yakap Konyak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that there are certain formal defects in the writ petition and therefore, the Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the same, with liberty to re-file.
2. Mr. L. T. Sangtam, learned Additional AG appears on behalf of the Respondent State.
3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. Liberty is granted to the Petitioner to re-file by removing the formal defects.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant