Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/143/2026 of SMTI. B. KUSHEN Vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 8 ORS on 17 September 2026
GAHC020006902026 2026:GAU-NL:483 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/143/2026 SMTI. B. KUSHEN W/O LATE THANGPONG KHIAM, PANGSHA OLD VILLAGE, NOKLAK, NAGALAND. VERSUS THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 8 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF
GAHC020006902026
2026:GAU-NL:483
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WP(C)/143/2026
SMTI. B. KUSHEN
W/O LATE THANGPONG KHIAM, PANGSHA OLD VILLAGE, NOKLAK, NAGALAND.
VERSUS
THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 8 ORS
THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA, NAGALAND.
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY (P AND AR)
TO THE GOVT OF NAGALAND
PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORMS DEPARTMENT
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
3:THE FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER
NAGALAND
KOHIMA.
4:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY (W AND H)
TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
WORKS AND HOUSING DEPARTMENT
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
5:THE ENGINEER IN CHIEF
NAGALAND PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
NAGALAND KOHIMA.
6:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT( HOUSING)
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ( HOUSING)
NOKLAK
NAGALAND
8:THE TREASURY OFFICER
TUENSANG
NAGALAND
9:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL
NAGALAND
KOHIM
Advocate for the Petitioner : I. IMTI LONGCHAR, THSACHOPA TS,MOANUKSUNG
KICHU,W YAKAP KONYAK,OBANGNENLA LONGCHAR,VIKHONO KISO
Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 18-09-2026
1. Mr. W. Yakap Konyak, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner submits that there are certain formal defects in the writ petition and therefore, the Petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the same, with liberty to re-file.
2. Mr. L. T. Sangtam, learned Additional AG appears on behalf of the Respondent State.
3. Taking into account the above, the writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. Liberty is granted to the
Petitioner to re-file by removing the formal defects.
4. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. JUDGE Comparing Assistant