Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/56/2025 of MR. ENIBEMO LOTHA Vs UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS on 23 August 2026
GAHC020001632025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/56/2025 MR. ENIBEMO LOTHA BROTHER OF LATE K. BIPENTHUNG LOTHA, P/O- TSUMANG A COLONY, WOKHA, NAGALAND VERSUS UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020001632025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WP(C)/56/2025
MR. ENIBEMO LOTHA
BROTHER OF LATE K. BIPENTHUNG LOTHA, P/O- TSUMANG A COLONY, WOKHA, NAGALAND
VERSUS
UNION OF INDIA AND 7 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF HEALTH AND FAMILY
WELFARE, NIRMAN BHAWAN NEW DELHI-110011
2:THE STATE OF
NAGALAND
REPRESENTED BY THECHIEF SECRETARY. GOVT. OF NAGALAND
NAGALAND KOHIMA
3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
GOVT. OF NAGALAND
HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE DEPT
NEW SECRETARIAT
NAGALAND KOHIMA-797001
4:THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
NAGALAND KOHIMA-797001
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WOKHA DISTRICT-797111
NAGALAND
6:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WOKHA NAGALAND
7:THE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
OFFICE OF TH CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER
WIKHA NAGALAND
Page No.# 2/2
8:NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD
REPRESENTED BY THE ASSISTANT MANAGER
GUWAHATI R.O.
NORTH EASTERN REGIONAL OFFICE
G.S. ROAD
BHANGAGARJ
GUWAHATI-781005
EMAIL- upashana.mishra@newindia.co.i
Advocate for the Petitioner : Z. KULNU, ASENLA LONGKUMER
Advocate for the Respondent : YANGER WATI,CGC, BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24.08.2026
All the parties duly represented by their engaged counsel. The learned counsels for both the parties have apprised this Court that the petitioner herein had received the compensation amount and as such, the prayer made in this petition has already been satisfied with and therefore, this petition may be closed. Accordingly, taking note of the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, this petition stands closed.
Sd/-
JUDGE Comparing Assistant