Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/140/2025 of SHRI S. PHANGTO PHOM AND 3 ORS Vs STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS on 23 August 2026
GAHC020004662025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/140/2025 SHRI S. PHANGTO PHOM AND 3 ORS W/C SKILLED LABOUR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD (R AND B) LONGLENG DIVISION, LONGLENG NAGALAND 2: SHRI HAUPEN PHOM W/C SKILLED
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020004662025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WP(C)/140/2025
SHRI S. PHANGTO PHOM AND 3 ORS
W/C SKILLED LABOUR, EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD (R AND B) LONGLENG
DIVISION, LONGLENG NAGALAND
2: SHRI HAUPEN PHOM
W/C SKILLED LABOUR
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD (R AND B) LONGLENG DIVISION
LONGLENG NAGALAND
3: SHRI PHONGJEI@ PONGJEI PHOM
W/C SKILLED LABOUR
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWD (R AND B) LONGLENG DIVISION
LONGLENG NAGALAN
VERSUS
STATE OF NAGALAND AND 6 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, NAGALAND KOHIMA
2:COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
WORKS AND HOUSING
NAGALAND KOHIMA
3:THE ENGINEER-IN-CHIEF
NPWD NAGALAND KOHIMA
4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER
PWD (R AND B) NAGALAND KOHIMA
5:THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER
DEPT. OF FINANCE
NAGALAND KOHIMA
6:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
PWD (R AND B) LONGLENG DIVISION. NAGALAND
7:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF
Page No.# 2/2
NAGALAND
PERSONNEL AND ADMINISTRATIVE REFORM
NAGALAND KOHIM
Advocate for the Petitioner : HISINLO HIMB, PHILIP LORIN,BERTA
TEP,LELIMTHONG P YIMCHUNGER
Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROBIN PHUKAN
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
24.08.2026
Heard Mr. H. Himb, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Inaholi, learned counsel for the State respondents. The learned counsel for petitioner submits that the prayer of the petitioner, made in this petition, has fully been complied with by the respondent authorities and as such, this petition may be closed. Accordingly, taking note of the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner and also considering the facts and circumstances on the record, this petition stands closed, as satisfied.
Sd/-
JUDGE Comparing Assistant