Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/10/2026 of SHRI VENTSUTHONG Vs THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY AND 3 ORS on 20 August 2026
GAHC020000382026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/10/2026 SHRI VENTSUTHONG SON OF KIUSUMONG, R/O SHAMATOR VILLAGE, H.NO. 212, SHANATOR DISTRICT, NAGALAND-798612 VERSUS THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY AND 3 ORS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020000382026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WP(C)/10/2026
SHRI VENTSUTHONG
SON OF KIUSUMONG, R/O SHAMATOR VILLAGE, H.NO. 212, SHANATOR
DISTRICT, NAGALAND-798612
VERSUS
THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY AND 3 ORS
GOVT. OF NAGALAND, DEPT. OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE, NGALAND
KOHIMA-797001
2:THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR
GOVT. OF NAGALAND
DIRECTORATE OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE
NAGALAND KOHIA-797001
3:THE MEDICAL OFFICER
COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE
SHAMATOR
TOWN
NAGALAND -798612
4:SMTI. R. KHUMJILA
C/O COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTRE (CHC)
SHAMATOR TOWN
NAGALAND SHAMATOR
-79861
Advocate for the Petitioner : C. T. JAMIR, SR. ADV, ALIBA OZUKUM,ASA
RUTSA,I IMCHEN,IMTILA PONGEN,JAWAMONG YADEN,KROVI
TSUKRU,NUNGSANG AIER,O TEMJEN JAMIR,TOSHI JAMIR
Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 21.08.2026 Ms. Asa Rutsa, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner has submitted that during the pendency of the present petition, subsequent developments have taken place and, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file a fresh petition. Mr. M. Longkumer, learned Government Advocate appearing for the State respondent Nos. 1 to 3 and Mr. P. Pfotte, learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 4 are present. After hearing both sides, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition.
Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant