Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/186/2026 of UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS Vs SHRI ANJANI KUMAR SINGH on 18 August 2026
GAHC020007042026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/186/2026 UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE, KRISHI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI-
GAHC020007042026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/186/2026
UNION OF INDIA AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF
AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE, KRISHI BHAWAN, NEW DELHI- 110001
2: THE HORTICULTURE COMMISSIONER
DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE COOPERATION AND FARMERS WELFARE
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE
GOVT. OF INDIA
KRISHI BHAWAN
NEW DELHI-110001
3: THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER (HORT-FRUIT)
DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE
GOVT. OF INDIA
KRISHI BHAWAN
NEW DELHI-110001
4: THE DIRECTOR
CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF HORTICULTURE
DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE
MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FARMERS WELFARE
GOVT. OF INDIA
MEDZIPHEMA
DIMAPUR NAGALAN
VERSUS
SHRI ANJANI KUMAR SINGH
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, S/O SHRI RAM NARAYAN SINGH, PRESENTLY
SERVING AS HORTICULTURE SPECIALIST, CENTRAL INSTITUTE OF
HORTICULTURE, MEDZIPHEMA, NAGALAND.
Advocate for the Petitioner : KROVI TSUKRU,
Advocate for the Respondent : ,
BEFORE
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUSMITA PHUKAN KHAUND
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 19.08.2026 (S.P.Khaund, J) The learned C.G.C. Mr. B. Deka is present for the applicants and has filed this application with a prayer for extension of 2(two) months time to implement the Judgment and Order dated 07.04.2026 passed by this Court in W.A.12/2025. It is submitted that against the judgment and order dated 07.04.2026 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.12/2025, the applicants had preferred an appeal before the Supreme Court and vide order dated 03.08.2026 passed by the Supreme Court in SLP(C) No.25501-25502/2026, the Supreme Court declined to interfere with the judgment impugned by the applicants. Thus, the applicants are before this Court with a prayer for extension of time to implement the direction of this Court. The learned counsel Mr. I. Jamir is present for the respondent and has submitted that the respondent will be highly prejudiced if further time will be taken by the applicants to comply with the direction of this Court. We have considered the submission at the bar.
Considering the inclination of the applicants to comply with the order of this Court, 2(two) months time is extended and the applicants are allowed 2(two) months time to comply with the direction of this Court as directed vide order dated 07.04.2026 in W.A.12/2025. It is also observed that no further extension of time will be allowed.
Sd/- Sd/- JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant