Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Crl.)/21/2026 of SHRI KUNUNGOI MEDEO Vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ANR on 23 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC020002702026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/21/2026 SHRI KUNUNGOI MEDEO S/O NGOSAYI MEDEO, R/O KHIISOMI VILLAGE, PO/PS CHOZUBA, PHEK, NAGALAND THROUGH THE JAILOR, DISTRICT JAIL, PHEK, NAGALAND. VERSUS

GAHC020002702026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL

PRADESH)

KOHIMA BENCH

Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/21/2026

SHRI KUNUNGOI MEDEO

S/O NGOSAYI MEDEO, R/O KHIISOMI VILLAGE, PO/PS CHOZUBA, PHEK, NAGALAND

THROUGH THE JAILOR,

DISTRICT JAIL, PHEK, NAGALAND.

VERSUS

THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND ANR

REPRESENTED BY THE P.P. NAGALAND

2:SHRI TEISOVIZO KHUSOH

S/O CIZO KHUSOH

R/O KHIISOMI VILLAGE

P/O CHOZUBA

PHEK

NAGALAND.

(COMPLAINANT)

Advocate for the Petitioner : TOSHI O. LONGKUMER, Advocate for the Respondent : ,

BEFORE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 24.06.2026 (NELSON SAILO, J)

Heard Mr. Toshi O. Longkumer, learned Legal Aid Counsel, for the applicant, who submits that by filing this application, the applicant prays for condonation of 1339 days delay in filing the connected appeal. The learned counsel submits that it was due to bona-fide reasons as stated in the application that the appeal could not be filed on time. He, therefore, submits that the delay may be condoned. Mr. E. Thiba Phom, learned Public Prosecutor, Nagaland, appears for the State respondent and Ms. Esther, learned Legal Aid Counsel, appears for the respondent No. 2, and they submit that they have no objection if the delay is condoned and that the appeal be heard on merits. Upon considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the parties and on perusal of the statements made in the application, the delay of 1339 days in filing the connected appeal stands condoned.

The interlocutory application stands disposed of as allowed.

Sd/- Sd/-

JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead