Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/128/2026 of THE KACHARI TRIBAL COUNCIL, NAGALAND (KTCN) Vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS on 15 June 2026
GAHC020004162026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/128/2026 THE KACHARI TRIBAL COUNCIL, NAGALAND (KTCN) HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PURANA BAZAAR, DISTRICT - DIMAPUR, NAGALAND. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, MR. C.K.
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020004162026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/128/2026
THE KACHARI TRIBAL COUNCIL, NAGALAND (KTCN)
HAVING ITS OFFICE AT PURANA BAZAAR, DISTRICT - DIMAPUR, NAGALAND. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT, MR. C.K. MECH.
S/O LATE DWARIKANATH MACH R/O HOUSE NO. 816, MIDDLE
COLONY, PURANA BAZAAR, DIMAPUR, NAGALAND
VERSUS
THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT. OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA, NAGALAND
2:THE HOME COMMISSIONER
GOVT. OF NAGALAND
KOHIMA
NAGALAND
3:THE COMMISSIONER NAGALAND
GOVT. OF NAGALAND
KOHIMA NAGALAND
4:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
DIMAPUR NAGALAND
5:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
CHUMUKEDIMA NAGALAND
6:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
PEREN NAGALAND
Advocate for the Petitioner : JOSHUA SHEQI, A HUKAVI SUMI,RUBICA
KIHO,TUNATO YEPTHO,R WONCHIBENI TSANGLO,KIVITOLI SWU,YEKA
SUMI,KEVI KIRE,K LILY SWU,KEDI KOSO,P MHONBENI EZUNG,MIKA H
Page No.# 2/2
AYE,CHINGMEI KONYAK,NAGALI SHOHE
Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 16-06-2026
Mr. Joshua Sheqi, learned counsel for the applicant submits that by filing this application, the applicant who is arrayed as petitioner No.3 in the main writ petition wishes to withdraw from the writ petition and therefore prays that the name of the petitioner No.3 be struck off from the arrayed petitioners. The learned counsel submits that withdrawal of the petitioner No.3 would not prejudice the case of any of the parties. Mr. Imti Imsong, learned Addl. A.G appearing for the State respondents and Ms. Esther, learned counsel appearing for the writ petitioners in the writ petition submits that they have no objection to the prayer made by the applicant. Accordingly, the applicant who is the writ petitioner No.3 in the main writ petition is allowed to withdraw from the writ petition as prayed for. I.A is disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant