Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/125/2026 of SHRI KHAANG Vs THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MON AND 4 ORS on 14 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC020004572026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/125/2026 SHRI KHAANG S/O LATE LEIYANG ANGH, R/O SHEANGGHAH MOKOK VILLAGE, P.O. P.S. MON, NAGALAND, MON VERSUS THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MON AND 4 ORS MON,

Page No.# 1/2

GAHC020004572026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL

PRADESH)

KOHIMA BENCH

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/125/2026

SHRI KHAANG

S/O LATE LEIYANG ANGH, R/O SHEANGGHAH MOKOK VILLAGE, P.O. P.S.

MON, NAGALAND, MON

VERSUS

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MON AND 4 ORS

MON, NAGALAND

2:THE STATE OF NAGALAND

REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF

NAGALAND

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

NAGALAND

KOHIMA

3:THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND FAMILY WELFARE

NAGALAND

KOHIMA

4:THE CHIEF MEDICAL OFFICER

MON

MON

NAGALAND

5:SHRI GANGGEM KONYAK

MEDICAL ATTENDANT

SHEANGHAH MOKOK SUB - CENTRE

MON

NAGALAN

Advocate for the Petitioner : PFOSEKHO PFOTTE, Advocate for the Respondent : , Page No.# 2/2

BEFORE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NELSON SAILO

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 15.06.2026

Heard Mr. Pfosekho Pfotte, learned counsel for the applicant, who submits that by filing this application, the applicant seeks impleadment of Deputy Commissioner, Mon as party respondent No.5 in the main writ petition. He submits that impleadment of the said party is necessary for effective adjudication of the writ petition. Ms. Bichano, learned Govt. Advocate and Ms. A. Jamir, learned counsel for the respondent No.5 submits that they have no objections if the application is allowed. Upon hearing the parties and upon perusal of the application, the application for impleadment as prayed for is hereby allowed. I.A. is accordingly stands disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead