Gauhati High Court

I.A.(Civil)/121/2026 of SMTI. KOYEL DUTTA Vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS on 3 June 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

GAHC020004272026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/121/2026 SMTI. KOYEL DUTTA RESIDING AT GOPINATHPUR, ARABINDAPALLI, POLICE STATION, BANKURA, DISTRICT - BANKURA, STATE WEST BENGAL - 722101 VERSUS THE STATE

GAHC020004272026

THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT

(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL

PRADESH)

KOHIMA BENCH

Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/121/2026

SMTI. KOYEL DUTTA

RESIDING AT GOPINATHPUR, ARABINDAPALLI, POLICE STATION, BANKURA, DISTRICT - BANKURA, STATE WEST BENGAL - 722101

VERSUS

THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS

REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVT OF NAGALAND, KOHIMA - 797001

2:THE SECRETARY

DEPT. OF FINANCE

GOVT. OF NAGALAND

NAGALAND CIVIL SECRETARIAT

KOHIMA-797001

3:THE DIRECTOR

NAGALAND STATE LOTTERIES

DEPT. OF FINANCE

GOVT. OF NAGALAND

NAGALAND CIVIL SECRETARIAT

KOHIMA-797001

4:THE NODAL OFFICER

KOLKATA CAMP

DIRECTORATE OF NAGALAND STATE LOTTERIES

NAGALAND HOUSE

1ST FLOOR

LA-BLOCK

PLOT NO.6

SALT LAKE

SECTOR 3

KOLKATA-700098

5:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE

CONNECTED TO GR. C/ NO. 149/2023

KOHIMA NORTH P.S. CASE NO. 51/23

6:THE INVESTIGATION OFFICER

CONNECTEDTO GR. CASE NO. 149/2023 AND KOHIMA NORTH POLICE

STATION CASE NO. 51/23 KOHIMA NAGALAND-79700

Advocate for the Petitioner : TONGPANG JAMIR, Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

Date : 04-06-2026 Heard Mr. Tongpang Jamir, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. Also heard Mr. K. Angami, learned Government Advocate appearing on behalf of the State respondents and Mr. Peter Rana, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent nos. 3 and 4.

2. This is an application filed by the legal heirs of one Joydip Dutta, who was the petitioner in the accompanying writ petition, and had expired on 12.01.2026. It is also taken note of that this Court by and order dated 29.05.2026 passed in IA(Civil)/81/2026 arising out of WP(C)/135/2025 had granted leave to the applicants to file a separate application for the purpose of the instant writ petition.

3. Taking into account that the right to sue survives upon the legal representatives of the original petitioner upon his death, this Court substitutes the original petitioner of the accompanying writ petition, with his legal heirs whose names have been mentioned in Para 4 of the instant application.

4. The legal heirs of the original petitioner shall accordingly be arrayed as petitioner nos. 1.1 and 1.2 to the accompanying writ petition.

5. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners shall within 7 (seven) days from today, submit a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court and the Registry shall on the basis of the present order as well as the said memo of parties make necessary changes in the cause title of the accompanying writ petition and update the same in the CIS.

6. The IA stands disposed of.

Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead