Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/91/2026 of ANGAMI WOMEN COOPERATIVE JOINT FARMING SOCIETY, DIMAPUR Vs SHRI WAKENYE SEB AND 9 ORS on 3 June 2026
GAHC020003312026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/91/2026 ANGAMI WOMEN COOPERATIVE JOINT FARMING SOCIETY DIMAPUR REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON SMTI. AVINO LONGCHAR HOUSE NO. 189 EKRANI PATHAR DIMAPUR
GAHC020003312026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/91/2026
ANGAMI WOMEN COOPERATIVE JOINT FARMING SOCIETY
DIMAPUR
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRPERSON
SMTI. AVINO LONGCHAR
HOUSE NO. 189
EKRANI PATHAR
DIMAPUR
NAGALAND.
VERSUS
SHRI WAKENYE SEB AND 9 ORS
S/O LATE GWASINLO SEB
R/O PHENWENYU VILLAGE
TSEMINYU
NAGALAND
2:THE STATE OF NAGALAND
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
KOHIMA
3:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
DIMAPUR
NAGALAND
4:SMTI. VIRIZENO KHATE
W/O LATE VIHULIE KHATE
LANE NO. 16 B-KHEL
KUDA VILLAGE
Page No.# 2/5
DIMAPUR NAGALAND
5:SMTI VITHONGUNO KHATE
DAUGHTER IN LAW OF LATE VIHULIE KHATE
R/O HOUSE NO. 14
LANE NO. 16
B- KHEL
KUDA VILLAGE
DIMAPUR
NAGALAND
6:SMTI. VISHURHONO KHATE
GRAND DAUGHTER-IN-LAW OF LATE
VILHULIE KHATE
R/O H/NO/. 14
LANE 16
B-KHEL
KUDA VILLAGE
DIMAPUR
NAGALAND
7:SHRI VIPHITUO KHATE
GRAND SON OF LATE VIHULIE KHATE
R/O H.NO. 14
LANE 16
B-KHEL
KUDA VILLAGE
DIMAPUR
NAGALAND
8:SHRI NOUNESELHU KHATE
GRAND SON OF LATE VIHULIE KHATE
R/O H.NO.14
LANE 16
B KHEL
KUDA VILLAGE
DIMAPUR
NAGALAND
9:SHRI SEYIEVITO KHATE
GRAND SON OF LATE VIHULIE KHATE
LANE NO.16
B-KHEL
KUDA VILLAGE
DIMAPUR NAGALAND
10:KUDA RAZHA ANGAMI MIAFU KROTHO
Page No.# 3/5
REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT
MRS. CUKA PESEYIE
R/O A KHEL
KUDA VILLAGE
DIMAPUR
NAGALAND
------------
Advocate for : IMTI LONGJEM
Advocate for : appearing for SHRI WAKENYE SEB AND 9 ORS
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 04-06-2026 Heard Mr. Imti Longjem, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant. Also heard Mr. T. B. Jamir, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party no. 1, who is the writ petitioner in the accompanying writ petition and Mr. L. T. Sangtam, learned Additional AG, Nagaland appearing on behalf of the performa respondent nos. 2 and 3/opposite party.
2. This is an application filed by the applicant seeking a direction that the applicant be arrayed as a party respondent to the accompanying writ petition.
3. This Court had duly taken note of the cause of action for which the writ petition was filed, whereby the order dated 06.11.2023 had been assailed. This Court also takes note of that the order impugned in the writ petition which is dated 06.11.2023, confers certain rights upon the applicant and under such circumstances, it is the claim of the applicant that the applicant is a necessary party for the adjudication to be made in the writ petition.
4. Mr. T. B. Jamir, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite party No. 1, who is the writ petitioner in the accompanying writ petition opposes to the said application on the ground that the applicant is neither a necessary party nor a proper party for the purpose of adjudication of the accompanying writ petition. He further submits that an affidavit has been filed in objection to the instant application.
5. This Court has duly perused the said affidavit.
6. Upon perusal of the order impugned in the writ petition dated 06.11.2023, passed by the Office of the Deputy Commissioner, Dimapur, it is seen that the rights of the applicant have also been taken note of, and it is the opinion of this Court that any adjudication made in the accompanying writ petition without hearing the applicant would not be in the interest of justice. It is the further opinion of this Court that the applicant herein is a necessary party to the accompanying writ petition.
7. Accordingly, this Court impleads the applicant to the accompanying writ petition as respondent no. 10.
8. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the writ petitioner is directed to file a fresh memo of parties before the Registry of this Court within 7 (seven) days from today, and the Registry on the basis thereof, shall make necessary changes in the cause title of the accompanying writ petition as well as update the same in the CIS.
9. The IA stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant