Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/80/2024 of SMTI. LOLANO JOHN NGULLIE Vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS on 1 June 2026
GAHC020002472024 2026:GAU-NL:324 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/80/2024 SMTI. LOLANO JOHN NGULLIE AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE ETSENYIMO JOHN NGULLIE, R/O HOUSE NO. 159, BANK COLONY, DIMAPUR-797112
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020002472024
2026:GAU-NL:324
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WP(C)/80/2024
SMTI. LOLANO JOHN NGULLIE
AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, DAUGHTER OF LATE ETSENYIMO JOHN
NGULLIE, R/O HOUSE NO. 159, BANK COLONY, DIMAPUR-797112
VERSUS
THE UNION OF INDIA AND 2 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF FINANCE, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, NORTH
BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001
2:THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
(AU)-1(1)
DIBRUGARH
STATION-DIMAPUR
NAGALAND
3:THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX
WARD-28(1)
RANGE-28
DELH
Advocate for the Petitioner : SENTIYANGER, CHUBA IMCHEN,KONLI BUCHEM,V
ANNE THERIE
Advocate for the Respondent : CGSC,
BEFORE:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Page No.# 2/2
Advocates
For the petitioner : Sentiyanger
For the respondent: Suman Chetia, SC, Income Tax
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
02.06.2026 Heard Mr. Sentiyanger, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Suman Chetia, the learned Standing Counsel for the Income Tax Department.
2. Mr. Sentiyanger, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as the petitioner had already filed an appeal before the Income Tax Appellate Authority, against the Assessment Order dated 19.02.2024, the petitioner herein would not like to further pursue the instant proceedings. He, however, submitted that the withdrawal of the instant petition should not prejudice the petitioner in the appeal so filed before the Appellate Authority or in further pursuing other remedies available under law.
3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. It is observed that the withdrawal of the instant petition would not prejudice the petitioner in the appeal filed before the Appellate Authority as well as in pursuing other available remedies provided under the Income Tax Act, 1961.
4. Interim order passed earlier stands vacated.
JUDGE Comparing Assistant