Gauhati High Court
WP(C)/190/2025 of SHRI YANPOTHUNG EZUNG AND 2 ORS Vs THE HOME COMMISSIONER AND 5 ORS on 31 May 2026
GAHC020006062025 2026:GAU-NL:317 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WP(C)/190/2025 SHRI YANPOTHUNG EZUNG AND 2 ORS S/O SHIPANTHUNG LOTHA, R/O YIMKHA VILLAGE, DISTRICT, WOKHA- NAGALAND, VDB SECRETARY YIMKHA VILLAGE 2: SHRI
GAHC020006062025
2026:GAU-NL:317
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WP(C)/190/2025
SHRI YANPOTHUNG EZUNG AND 2 ORS
S/O SHIPANTHUNG LOTHA, R/O YIMKHA VILLAGE, DISTRICT, WOKHA- NAGALAND, VDB SECRETARY YIMKHA VILLAGE
2: SHRI BENJAMIN NGULLIE
S/O LT. LUMCHAMO NGULLIE
R/O YIMKHA VILLAGE
DISTRICT- WOKHA
NAGALAND
3: SMTI. NZANO EZUNG
D/O NLUMO EZUNG
R/O YIMKHA VILLAGE
WOKHA
NAGALAN
VERSUS
THE HOME COMMISSIONER AND 5 ORS
GOVT. OF NAGALAND, NAGALAND KOHIMA
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WOKHA NAGALAND
3:THE ADDITIONAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
WOKHA NAGALAND
4:THE CHAIRMAN
YIMKHA VILLAGE COUNCIL
WOKHA NAGALAND
5:SHRI ZUCHANBEMO EZUNG
R/O YIMKHA VILLAGE
WOKHA NAGALAND
6:SMTI. THUNGCHUMI T. NGULLIE
R/O YIMKHA VILLAGE
WOKHA NAGALAND
Advocate for the Petitioner : W R NGULLIE, MERIBEMO TUNGOE
Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Advocates
For the petitioners : Mr. W.R. Ngullie
For the Private respondents : Mr. C.T. Jamir (R-5 & 6)
For the respondents : Mr. E.Thiba Phom (R-1,2 & 3)
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
01.06.2026 Mr. W.R. Ngullie, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the present writ petition cannot be proceeded with in its form, taking into account that in the meantime, a selection/election(s) had already taken place and the result have also been announced. He therefore submits that the petitioner may be permitted to withdraw the instant writ petition without prejudice to the petitioner to again approach this Court challenging the result of the selection/election. Mr. C.T. Jamir, the learned Senior Counsel appears on behalf of the private respondent Nos. 5 & 6 and submits that he has no objection on the withdrawal with liberty.
Considering the above, the instant writ petitioner therefore stands closed on withdrawal. It is observed that the withdrawal of the instant writ petition shall not preclude and prejudice the petitioner to again approach this Court challenging the result of the selection/election. Mr. E. Thiba Phom, the learned Government Advocate appears for the respondent Nos. 1,2 & 3. JUDGE Comparing Assistant