Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/116/2026 of SHRI TSICHOPA SANGTAM AND ANR Vs STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS on 31 May 2026
GAHC020003092026 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/116/2026 SHRI TSICHOPA SANGTAM AND ANR S/O LATE PIRISE SANGTAM R/O GOVT. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL WARD - 2 KIPHIRE TOWN NAGALAND 2: SHRI ATO YIMCHUNGER S/O
GAHC020003092026
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/116/2026
SHRI TSICHOPA SANGTAM AND ANR
S/O LATE PIRISE SANGTAM
R/O GOVT. HIGHER SECONDARY SCHOOL
WARD - 2
KIPHIRE TOWN
NAGALAND
2: SHRI ATO YIMCHUNGER
S/O YAMLU TIKHIR
R/O HOUSE NO. 330
REST HOUSE WARD
KIPHIRE TOWN
NAGALAND
VERSUS
STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
KOHIMA
2:THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KIPHIRE
NAGALAND
3:THE EXTRA ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER (HQ)
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KIPHIRE
NAGALAND
4:SHRI R. MUTHSODANG SANGTAM
DB GRADE - 1
OFFICE OF THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KIPHIRE
NAGALAND
------------
Advocate for : ASEN T JAMIR
Advocate for : GOVT ADV NL appearing for STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH
Advocates
For the applicants
: Mr. T.B. Jamir
For the respondents : Mr. N. Angami, Sr. Govt. Adv.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
01.06.2026
Heard Mr. T.B. Jamir, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants and Mr. N. Angami, the learned Senior Government Advocate appears on behalf of the State respondent Nos. 1, 2 & 3.
2. This is an application for correction of the credentials of the petitioner as regards to their father’s name and address which on an account of an inadvertent error was wrongly mentioned. The correct particulars/details of the addresses of the petitioners have been provided at paragraph-2 of the instant application.
3. Taking into account that the said mistakes being inadvertent errors and the correct name of the father of the petitioners as well as the addresses are required for an affective adjudication of the present proceedings, this Court allows the instant application thereby incorporating the names of the petitioners along with their details and addresses as mentioned in paragraph-2 of the instant application.
4. This Court further directs the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners to submit a fresh Memo of parties before the Registry of this Court within 7 (seven) days and the Registry shall make necessary changes in the Cause Title and update the same in the CIS. I.A. stands disposed.
Sd/- JUDGE Comparing Assistant