Gauhati High Court
WA/19/2025 of MRS ATWA MERU Vs STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS on 13 May 2026
GAHC020004362025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : WA/19/2025 MRS ATWA MERU INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE, ULB ELECTION 2024, OLD MARKET COLONY, WARD NO. 4, JALUKIE TOWN, PEREN, NAGALAND VERSUS STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020004362025
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL
PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : WA/19/2025
MRS ATWA MERU
INDEPENDENT CANDIDATE, ULB ELECTION 2024, OLD MARKET COLONY, WARD NO. 4, JALUKIE TOWN, PEREN, NAGALAND
VERSUS
STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY/ COMMISSIONER, DEPT. OF MUNICIPAL AFFAIRS, KOHIMA NAGALAND 2:MS MENAILIU
DAUGHTER OF LATE DAULUBO
H.NO. 215
OLD MARKET
WARD 4
JALUKIE TOWN
PEREN NAGALAND
3:THE ELECTION TRIBUNAL
MUNICIPAL AND TOWN COUNCILS
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER
NAGALAND
KOHIMA NAGALAND
4:MRS. NGAUGIA ILEILUNG
(NOMINEE CANDIDATE OF MRS
ATWA MERU) OLD MARKET COLONY
WARD NO. 4
JALUKIE TOWN NAGALAN
Advocate for the Petitioner : C. T. JAMIR, SR. ADV, ALIBA OZUKUM,ASA
RUTSA,I IMCHEN,IMTILA PONGEN,JAWAMONG YADEN,KROVI
TSUKRU,NUNGSANG AIER,O TEMJEN JAMIR,TOSHI JAMIR
Advocate for the Respondent : GOVT ADV NL, Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 14-05-2026 (U.K. Nair, J)
1. Heard Mr. C.T. Jamir, learned Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. I. Imchen, learned counsel for the appellant. Also heard Mr. A Zhimomi, and Ms. Esther, learned counsels appearing for the respondent No.2 and Mr. Moa Imchen, learned Addl. Advocate General appearing for the State respondents.
2. Mr. C.T. Jamir, learned Senior counsel for the appellant, after attempting to argue the matter at some lenght has submitted that he may be permitted to withdraw the present appeal, with liberty to approach the writ Court with a request for an expeditious consideration of the writ petition being WP (C) No.71/2025
3. On a consideration of the submission made by the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner, which is also not objected to by the learned counsel for the respondents, we accept such submissions made by the learned Senior counsel for the petitioner.
4. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal, with liberty as prayed for.
JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant