Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Crl.)/3/2026 of SHRI LATIBUR RAHMAN Vs STATE OF NAGALAND AND ANR on 12 May 2026
GAHC020000162026 2026:GAU-NL:260-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/3/2026 SHRI LATIBUR RAHMAN S/O LT/ ABDUL JULIL, V/O MUSLAM CHOPORE, P.O/P.S- TEZPUR, PRESENT ADDRESS- GRACE COLONY, RAIL BAZAAR, DIMAPUR,
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020000162026
2026:GAU-NL:260-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Crl.)/3/2026
SHRI LATIBUR RAHMAN
S/O LT/ ABDUL JULIL, V/O MUSLAM CHOPORE, P.O/P.S- TEZPUR, PRESENT ADDRESS- GRACE COLONY, RAIL BAZAAR, DIMAPUR, NAGFALAND-797112
VERSUS
STATE OF NAGALAND AND ANR
REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ,NAGALAND
2:REBECCA @ MONICA
D/O RIAZ UDDIN
R/O GRACE COLONY
OPPOSITE RAILWAY BAZAR
DIMAPUR
NAGALAND- 79711
Advocate for the Petitioner : PFOSEKHO PFOTTE, Advocate for the Respondent : P.P, NAGALAND,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UNNI KRISHNAN NAIR
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH MAZUMDAR
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
O R D E R
13-05-2026 (R.Mazumdar,J) Heard Mr. M. Vero, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. K. Angami, learned PP for the State. Seen the Office note dated 18.02.2026 which reflects that the notice has been served on the respondent no. 2. However, none appears for the respondent no. 2 today. This is an interlocutory application praying for condonation of delay of 991 days in filing the connected appeal against the Judgment and Order dated 28.07.2023 passed in GR case no. 347/2021 by the learned Special Judge, Fast Track Special Court, POCSO, Dimapur, sentencing the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 (twenty) years with a fine of Rs. 20,000/- only, under section 376 (3) IPC read with Section 4 POCSO Act. It is submitted that the applicant is serving his sentence in jail, and therefore, there is a delay in preferring this connected appeal. We have considered the submissions made and the reasons given for the delay and we are satisfied with the causes shown. Accordingly, the delay of 991 days in condoned. I.A. stands disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE Comparing Assistant