Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/69/2026 of SMTI. EASTER KAPFO AND ANR Vs THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS on 29 April 2026
GAHC020002722026 2026:GAU-NL:237 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/69/2026 SMTI. EASTER KAPFO AND ANR I.E. RESOURCE PERSON, POSTED AT PHEK TOWN, PHEK, NAGALAND 2: MS. IMNASENLA I. IMSONG I.E. RESOURCE PERSON
GAHC020002722026
2026:GAU-NL:237
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/69/2026
SMTI. EASTER KAPFO AND ANR
I.E. RESOURCE PERSON, POSTED AT PHEK TOWN, PHEK, NAGALAND
2: MS. IMNASENLA I. IMSONG
I.E. RESOURCE PERSON
POSTED AT MOKOKCHUNG VILLAG
VERSUS
THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 5 ORS
REPRESENTED BY THE CHIEF SECRETARY, NAGALAND, KOHIMA
2:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY
TO THE GOVT. OF NAGALAND
SCHOOL EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
3:THE STATE COMMISSIONER
COMMISSION FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITY
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
4:THE REHABILITATION COUNCIL OF INDIA
THROUGH ITS MEMBER SECRETARY
B-22
QUTUB INSTITUTIONAL AREA
NEW DELHI - 110016
5:THE PRINCIPAL DIRECTOR
DIRECTORATE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION
GOVT. OF NAGALAND. KOHIMA
NAGALAND.
6:THE STATE MISSION DIRECTOR
NAGALAND EDUCATION MISSION SAMAGRA SHIKSHA
NAGALAND
KOHIM
Advocate for the Petitioner : GRACE I NAMGI, Advocate for the Respondent : , BEFORE
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 30-04-2026 Heard Ms. Grace I Namgi, learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Mr. N. Angami, learned Government Advocate for the respondent nos. 1, 2 and 5 and Ms. K. Kire, learned counsel for the respondent no. 3. It is submitted that both the respondent no. 4 and respondent no. 6 have been served notice via speed post and dasti service respectively in the main petition, and compliance affidavit to that effect has also been filed. Today, the matter has come up for passing order in the present interlocutory application which has been filed for striking out the names of the petitioner no. 24, Easter Kapfo and petitioner no. 26, Imnasenla I Imsong in WP(C)/165/2025. It is stated and submitted that these two petitioners no longer wishes to pursue the matter, and therefore, seeks deletion of their names from the list of petitioners in WP(C)/165/2025. The aforementioned learned counsel for the respondents submits that they have no objection to the said prayer. Accordingly, the petitioner no. 24 namely, Easter Kapfo, and petitioner no. 26, namely Imnasenla I Imsong are struck off from the list of petitioners in WP(C)/165/2025. The IA stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant