Gauhati High Court
I.A.(Civil)/36/2026 of THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS Vs SHRI HEVISHE SEMA on 21 April 2026
GAHC020001352026 2026:GAU-NL:225-DB THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) KOHIMA BENCH Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/36/2026 THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGLAND 2: THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER NAGALAND KOHIMA 3:
Page No.# 1/2
GAHC020001352026
2026:GAU-NL:225-DB
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT
(HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH)
KOHIMA BENCH
Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/36/2026
THE STATE OF NAGALAND AND 3 ORS
THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF NAGLAND
2: THE FINANCE COMMISSIONER
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
3: THE COMMISSIONER
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER
NAGALAND
KOHIMA
4: THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
KIPHIRE
NAGALAN
VERSUS
SHRI HEVISHE SEMA
SWEEPER, UNDER EAC SITIMI KIPHIRE
Advocate for the Petitioner : E THIBA PHOM, Advocate for the Respondent : ,
Page No.# 2/2
BEFORE
HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE YARENJUNGLA LONGKUMER
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRANJAL DAS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
Date : 22-04-2026 (Y.Longkumer,J) Learned Government Advocate, Mr. E. Thiba Phom is present for the applicants and submits that he has taken steps for service of notice upon the respondents by serving the same on the learned counsel, Mr. Moa Jamir. Mr. M. Solo, learned counsel appears on behalf of the respondent and submits that he has no objection regarding the present application. The instant application has been filed under section 5 of the Limitation Act praying for condonation of delay of 839 days in filing the connected Writ Appeal/7/2026. The reasons for the delay have been set out in paragraphs 2, 3 and 4 of the application. We have gone through the reasons for the delay and find that sufficient cause has been shown. Moreover, the respondents also have not objected to the prayer for condonation. In the result, the instant application is allowed. The delay of 839 days in filing the connected Writ Appeal/7/2026 is condoned. The application stands allowed and disposed of.
JUDGE
JUDGE Comparing Assistant