Gujarat High Court

SCA/14593/2026 of DEVDA TANSINH BHEMJI Vs DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER on 12 October 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

12/10/2026 (GJHC240721422026) IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14593 of 2026 ========================================================== DEVDA TANSINH BHEMJI Versus DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER & ORS.

C/SCA/14593/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/10/2026

(GJHC240721422026)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 14593 of 2026

==========================================================

DEVDA TANSINH BHEMJI

Versus

DEVELOPMENT COMMISSIONER & ORS.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR NITINBHAI M DESAI(13406) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1

MR.KIRIT R CHAUDHARI(3745) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1

MR. PARTH PATEL, ASSISTANT GOVERNMENT PLEADER for the Respondent(s) No. 1

MR RB THAKOR(6743) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRANAV TRIVEDI

Date : 12/10/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Mr.Parth Patel, learned Assistant Government Pleader, has placed on record the communication received from the Additional Development Commissioner, State of Gujarat, wherein, it is stated that the hearing of the revision application of the petitioner was fixed on 08.10.2026.

According to Mr.Patel, learned AGP, the main grievance of the writ petitioner was with regard to hearing of the revision application, and therefore, after the filing of the present writ petition, when hearing was given to the petitioner on 08.10.2026, the grievance as raised by the petitioner would not survive.

C/SCA/14593/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/10/2026 (GJHC240721422026)

Even the learned advocate for the petitioner was not in a position to controvert this aspect and has stated that in view of such development, the present writ petition would become infructuous.

In view of such development, the present writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. (PRANAV TRIVEDI,J) BIMAL

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: BIMAL B CHAKRAVARTY(HC01089), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/10/2026 17:37:35

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead