Gujarat High Court

CR.MA/24155/2026 of RAMILABEN NARENDRAKUMAR PRAJAPATI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 12 October 2026

12/10/2026 (GJHC240774772026) IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO. 24155 of 2026 ========================================================== RAMILABEN NARENDRAKUMAR PRAJAPATI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

R/CR.MA/24155/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/10/2026

(GJHC240774772026)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO.

24155 of 2026

==========================================================

RAMILABEN NARENDRAKUMAR PRAJAPATI

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR DINESHKUMAR J PRAJAPATI(9979) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR TRUPESH KATHIRIYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY

Date : 12/10/2026

ORDER

1. Leave to amend. The amendment is ordered to be carried out forthwith.

2. Present Petition is preferred by the Petitioner (Original Accused) under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of the order dated 10.11.2025 passed in Criminal Case No.3709 of 2023 by learned 3rd Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palanpur in Banaskantha as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the said complaint.

3. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner and learned APP for the Respondent – State. Learned Advocate Ms. Jayshree Bhatt appears and states that she has received instructions to appear on behalf of Respondent No.2 – Original Complainant and she would be filing her appearance before the Registry. Registry to accept the Vakalatnama.

Page 1 of 2

R/CR.MA/24155/2026 ORDER DATED: 12/10/2026 (GJHC240774772026)

4. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondent – State and learned Advocate appearing for the respondent complainant waives service of Rule on behalf of the Original Complainant.

5. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they are now not willing to proceed with the complaint any further.

6. The complainant Dipakkumar Rameshbhai Patel is present before the Court in-person, who has been identified by learned advocate appearing for the complainant.

7. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf of Original Complainant has placed on record the Affidavit dated 05.10.2026. He submitted that matter has been amicably settled between the parties and there is no objection if present Petition is allowed.

8. Considering averments made in the Affidavit as also the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the respective parties, the present Application deserves to be allowed and is hereby allowed. The order dated 10.11.2025 passed in Criminal Case No.3709 of 2023 by learned 3rd Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palanpur in Banaskantha as well as all other consequential proceedings arising out of the said complaint is hereby quashed and set aside qua the present Petitioner. Rule is made absolute. (M. R. MENGDEY,J) NABILA

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: NABILABANU MOHAMADNOOR PATNIJAMAT(HC00630), Private Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/10/2026 17:07:56

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead