Gujarat High Court

CR.RA/813/2016 of NIMIT ASHWINBHAI THACKER Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 30 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

30/09/2026 (GJHC240539142016) IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (FOR MAINTENANCE) NO. 813 of 2016 ========================================================== NIMIT ASHWINBHAI THACKER Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

R/CR.RA/813/2016 ORDER DATED: 30/09/2026

(GJHC240539142016)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (FOR MAINTENANCE) NO. 813 of

==========================================================

NIMIT ASHWINBHAI THACKER

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR RAJAN D SHAH(3101) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR RF BHAGAT(1350) for the Respondent(s) No. 2

MS. C.M. SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO

Date : 30/09/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. When the matter is called out, learned advocate Mr. Rajan D. Shah for the applicant as well as learned advocate Mr. R.F. Bhagat for the respondent No.2 are not present.

2. Pursuant to an order dated 16.09.2026, as the learned advocates for the respective parties were not preset, an order to issue a notice to the applicant was passed and on perusal of the record, it appears that the notice has returned unserved with the endorsement that the applicant has left the address as mentioned in the application for the past two years and his whereabouts are not known. The statement of the neighbor – Pankajkumar Pandit, has been recorded by the

R/CR.RA/813/2016 ORDER DATED: 30/09/2026 (GJHC240539142016) Unarmed Head Constable, Ellis-Bridge Police Station, Ahmedabad City, wherein it is stated that the applicant had sold the house about two years ago and that his whereabouts are not known.

3. It appears that learned advocates for the respective parties have consistently remained absent before the Court to make any submissions and in view of the fact that the whereabouts of the applicant are not known, the present application stands dismissed for non-prosecution. However, it is clarified that it would be open for the applicant to revive the same in case of necessity.

4. Hence, the present application stands dismissed for non-prosecution with the above liberty. (S. V. PINTO,J) ROHAN SONI

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: ROHAN SONI(HC02356), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 30/09/2026 14:39:09

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead