Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/314/2026 of PARMAR DHARMENDRA DINESHBHAI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 22 September 2026
22/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO. 314 of 2026 ========================================================== PARMAR DHARMENDRA GOVINDBHAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
R/CR.MA/314/2026(GJHC240006342026) ORDER DATED: 22/09/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONSENT QUASHING) NO. 314
of 2026
==========================================================
PARMAR DHARMENDRA GOVINDBHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
BHARATKUMAR A DESAI(8513) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MANGAL V GADHAVI(11922) for the Respondent(s) No. 3
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR. VINAY VISHEN, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE M. R. MENGDEY
Date : 22/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. Leave to amend the name of the Applicant as “Parmar Dharmendra Dineshbhai”.
2. Present Petition is preferred by the Petitioner (Original Accused) under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 11215039250277 of 2025 registered with Virsad Police Station, Anand for the offences punishable under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
3. Heard learned Advocate for the Petitioner and learned APP for the Respondent – State. Learned Advocate Mr. Dipesh D. Soni appears and states that he has received instructions to appear on behalf of Respondent No. 3 and he would be filing his appearance during the course of the day. Registry to accept the Vakalatnama.
4. Rule. Learned APP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondent – State and learned Advocate Mr. Soni waives service of
R/CR.MA/314/2026(GJHC240006342026) ORDER DATED: 22/09/2026 Rule on behalf of Respondent No.3. Though served, nobody appeared for Respondent No.2 – Original Complainant.
5. Learned Advocate for the Petitioner has submitted that the matter has been amicably settled between the parties and they are now not willing to proceed with the complaint any further.
6. Learned Advocate appearing on behalf victim has placed on record the Affidavit dated 5.01.2026 stating therein that she has performed marriage with the present Applicant after she has attained the marriageable age and presently she is living with the Applicant as his wife. He submitted that matter has been amicably settled between the parties and there is no objection if present Petition is allowed. The victim is present before the court and is identified by her Advocate.
6. Considering averments made in the Affidavit as also the submissions made by the learned Advocates for the respective parties, the present Application deserves to be allowed and is hereby allowed. The F.I.R. 11215039250277 of 2025 registered with Virsad Police Station, Anand for the offences punishable under Section 137(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 is hereby quashed and set aside qua the present Petitioner. Rule is made absolute. (M. R. MENGDEY,J) J.N.W / 163
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: JAYANTILAL NARAYAN WAGHELA(HC00178), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 24/09/2026 10:49:38