Gujarat High Court
CR.RA/829/2018 of MILANRAJ SURESHBHAI CHAUHAN Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 22 September 2026
22/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (FOR MAINTENANCE) NO. 829 of 2018 ========================================================== MILANRAJ SURESHBHAI CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
R/CR.RA/829/2018(GJHC240440102018) ORDER DATED: 22/09/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (FOR MAINTENANCE) NO. 829 of
==========================================================
MILANRAJ SURESHBHAI CHAUHAN
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
ADVOCATE NOTICE SERVED for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. DHAVAL G BAROT(6546) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
MR YUVRAJ BRAHMBHATT , APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
SANKET K PANDYA(9451) for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE S.V. PINTO
Date : 22/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. When the matter is called out, learned advocate for the applicant is not present and there is no submission on his behalf.
2. Learned advocate for the respondent Nos.2 and 3 is present.
3. By an order dated 16.03.2026, a fresh advocate notice was ordered to be issued to the applicant and accordingly, when the notice went for service to the address mentioned in the petition, the notice remained unserved as the applicant was not found at the given address. The unarmed Police Constable, Buckle No.440 of Sector 7,
R/CR.RA/829/2018(GJHC240440102018) ORDER DATED: 22/09/2026 Gandhinagar Police Station, recorded the statement of - Sureshkumar Bhavchanbhai Chauhan, the father of the applicant, on 11.08.2020, and as per the statement, he has stated that the applicant, who is his son, has left the house for the past six to seven years and they are not in contact with him for the past six to seven years. He does not know where the applicant is residing and has no knowledge about his address or any other details and he does not wish to accept the notice on behalf of his son as he has no information of his whereabouts.
4. In view of the same, it appears that the applicant is not willing to prosecute the matter, as the advocate on record has withdrawn his appearance and there is no further representation made on his behalf of the applicant.
5. In view of the same, the present application stands dismissed for non-prosecution.
6. However, it would be open to the applicant to revive the same in case of necessity. (S. V. PINTO,J) ROHAN SONI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: ROHAN SONI(HC02356), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 23/09/2026 16:06:42