Gujarat High Court

FA/469/2012 of WILWAY HOLOGRAPHICS Vs SHREE RAM RESINS PVT LTD on 11 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

11/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 469 of 2012 ========================================================== WILWAY HOLOGRAPHICS Versus SHREE RAM RESINS PVT LTD ========================================================== Appearance: ADVOCATE NOTICE UNSERVED

C/FA/469/2012(GJHC240388972012) ORDER DATED: 11/09/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 469 of 2012

==========================================================

WILWAY HOLOGRAPHICS

Versus

SHREE RAM RESINS PVT LTD

==========================================================

Appearance:

ADVOCATE NOTICE UNSERVED for the Appellant(s) No. 1

MS JOLLY NISHIT SHAH(3993) for the Defendant(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

and

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI

Date : 11/09/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)

1. This first appeal is directed against the judgment dated 23.01.2012 passed in Summary Suit No.6 of 2010, whereby learned Civil Judge, Bardoli at Surat was pleased to allow the Summary Suit and directed the appellant- original defendant to pay a sum of Rs.32,37,366/- with interest @ 24% per annum from the date of suit till the realization of the amount.

2. Since long, neither the appellant, nor, the counsel appeared to argue the matter. Learned counsel Mr. Darji had withdrawn his appearance and despite of intimation given by him to the appellant, no any counsel being retained by the appellant herein. In such circumstances, it appears that, the appellant is not interested to pursue the appeal.

C/FA/469/2012(GJHC240388972012) ORDER DATED: 11/09/2026

3. The appeal has been listed under the head of “Critically Old Matters”.

4. Thus, therefore, by exercising powers under Order 41Rule 17 of the CPC, the appeal stands dismissed for non-prosecution. R & P be sent back to the trial court. (ILESH J. VORA,J) (R. T. VACHHANI, J) TAUSIF SAIYED

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: TAUSIFAHMED SAIYED(HC01401), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 11/09/2026 17:37:24

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead