Gujarat High Court

FA/652/2013 of NAGINBHAI KESHAVBHAI VANDAR Vs PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS GUJARAT on 10 September 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

10/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 652 of 2013 ========================================================== NAGINBHAI KESHAVBHAI VANDAR Versus PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS GUJARAT & ANR.

C/FA/652/2013(GJHC240389062013) ORDER DATED: 10/09/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 652 of 2013

==========================================================

NAGINBHAI KESHAVBHAI VANDAR

Versus

PASCHIM GUJARAT VIJ COMPANY LTD (FORMERLY KNOWN AS

GUJARAT & ANR.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR HARSHIT S TOLIA(2708) for the Appellant(s) No. 1

MR PARTH S TOLIA(5617) for the Appellant(s) No. 1

MR RITURAJ M MEENA(3224) for the Defendant(s) No. 1

RULE NOT RECD BACK for the Defendant(s) No. 2

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA

and

HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI

Date : 10/09/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)

1. Mr. .Parth Tolia, learned advocate is tendering the correspondence of prior intimation given to the appellant for withdrawal of their appearance and same is taken on record.

2. This First Appeal is directed against the judgment and decree passed in Special Civil Suit No. 14 of 2008, whereby, the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Veraval, by allowing the money suit filed by the respondents, directed the appellant to pay the decreetal amount along with the interest.

3. Mr. Parth Tolia, learned advocate taking basis of the intimation, as produced, requested this Court to permit the advocate on record as well as the others to withdraw their appearance for and on behalf

C/FA/652/2013(GJHC240389062013) ORDER DATED: 10/09/2026 of the appellant. The permission as sought is granted.

4. Having regard to the facts of the case and intimation given by the counsel to the appellant, we do not deem it fit to issue advocate notice on the appellant. The appellant – original defendant no. 2 is aware about the pendency of the appeal and despite of this, he has not cared to replace the advocate.

5. Thus, by exercising our powers under Order 47 Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the appeal is ordered to be dismissed on the ground of non-prosecution. Accordingly, appeal stands dismiss. (ILESH J. VORA,J) (R. T. VACHHANI, J) P.S. JOSHI

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: PALLAV SUBHASHCHANDRA JOSHI(HC00177), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 10/09/2026 17:01:34

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead