Gujarat High Court
SCA/11817/2026 of M/S SELSITES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR JAYESH G SHAH Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 8 September 2026
08/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11817 of 2026 ===================================================== M/S SELSITES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR JAYESH G SHAH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. =====================================================
C/SCA/11817/2026(GJHC240528362026) ORDER DATED: 08/09/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 11817 of 2026
=====================================================
M/S SELSITES THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR JAYESH G SHAH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
=====================================================
Appearance:
MR RUSI B TRIVEDI(11227) for the Petitioner(s) No. 1
MR ANUJ K TRIVEDI(6251) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
=====================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NIRZAR S. DESAI
Date : 08/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. At the outset, learned advocate Mr. Anuj Trivedi, appearing for the respondent No.2, has placed on record a photocopy of the communication dated 27.08.2026 addressed to the proprietor/owner of the petitioner by the officers of the AMC, stating that the branches of the trees causing hindrance to the advertising site of the petitioner had already been trimmed on 24.08.2026. Photographs are also annexed along with the aforesaid communication.
2. In view of the aforesaid communication placed on
C/SCA/11817/2026(GJHC240528362026) ORDER DATED: 08/09/2026 record by learned advocate Mr. Anuj Trivedi, learned advocate Mr. Rushi Trivedi, appearing for the petitioner, upon instructions, seeks permission to withdraw the present petition at this stage. He, however, submits that liberty may be reserved in favour of the petitioner to revive the present petition in case of any difficulty or if it is found that the respondents have not acted in accordance with the communication placed on record.
3. Permission, as prayed for, is granted. The present petition stands disposed of as withdrawn. Liberty is reserved in favour of the petitioner to revive the present petition in case of any difficulty or if the respondents fail to act in accordance with the aforesaid communication.
4. It is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter. (NIRZAR S. DESAI,J) Pallavi
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: PALLAVIBEN PRABHUDAS PANCHAL(HC01403), PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/09/2026 15:34:28