Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/12284/2026 of VIJAY HARSHADBHAI JASOLIYA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 8 September 2026
08/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (HABEAS CORPUS) NO. 12284 of 2026 ====================================== VIJAY HARSHADBHAI JASOLIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ====================================== Appearance: MR ROHITKUMAR R
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (HABEAS
CORPUS) NO. 12284 of 2026
======================================
VIJAY HARSHADBHAI JASOLIYA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
======================================
Appearance:
MR ROHITKUMAR R SHARMA(12025) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
NOTICE NOT RECD BACK for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4,5,6,7,8
MS. SHRUTI PATHAK, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
======================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE
and
HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE NISHA M. THAKORE
Date : 08/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.Y. KOGJE)
1. In response to the notice issued earlier, the corpus was produced before the Court through the concerned Police Station, as the corpus was in Nari Vikas Kendra at Surat. The respondent no.5 – father of the corpus is also present before the Court.
2. It appears that the marriage has already been solemnized between the petitioner and the corpus – respondent no.6 and the marriage certificate is annexed at Annexure-B. The corpus is major. The Court has interacted with the corpus in presence of the learned advocates for the respective parties, learned APP as well as the respondent – father. The concerned raised by the father is only with regards to the well being of his daughter after the solemnization of the marriage and therefore, the petitioner is required to file an affidavit before this Court to which the learned advocate for the petitioner assures the Court that during the course of the day, an affidavit will be filed to the extent that the petitioner will take due and proper care of his wife – respondent no.6 with all matrimonial rights and will not give any occasion to complain. He would also file an affidavit to the extent that both the petitioner and his wife will not claim any right in the property of the father.
3. In view of the aforesaid and particularly, the marriage being solemnized between the petitioner the respondent no.6 wife and the wife being major, is at free will to join any person of her choice.
4. Upon interaction, the wife has indicated that she would like to go in company of her husband. In view of the aforesaid, no further orders are required to be passed. The petitioner shall file aforesaid affidavit before this Court within a period of two days and the respondent no.6 is permitted to go with the person of her choice being her husband.
5. In view of the apprehension raised by the petitioner, learned APP for the respondent – State authority, may provide for safe passage of the petitioner and the respondent no.6 corpus.
6. With the aforesaid observations, the present petition stands disposed of. Notice stands discharged. (A.Y. KOGJE, J.) (NISHA M. THAKORE, J.) AMAR RATHOD.../sfs/08.09
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: AMAR KANTILAL RATHOD(HC01074), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/09/2026 16:05:50