Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/5417/2026 of KISHAN MOTILAL PARIYANI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 8 September 2026
08/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 5417 of 2026 In F/CRIMINAL APPEAL/2413/2026 ========================================== KISHAN MOTILAL PARIYANI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
R/CR.MA/5417/2026(GJHC240155212026) ORDER DATED: 08/09/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF
DELAY) NO. 5417 of 2026
In
F/CRIMINAL APPEAL/2413/2026
==========================================
KISHAN MOTILAL PARIYANI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
==========================================
Appearance:
MR ASHISH M DAGLI(2203) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR MANISH S SHAH(5859) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS JIRGA JHAVERI APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK
Date : 08/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. RULE. Learned counsel waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respective respondents.
2. The application is filed by the applicant to condone the delay of 32 days occurred in filing the Criminal Appeal.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that sufficient explanation has been made in the application. He has submitted that the application deserves to be allowed and the delay occurred in filing the Criminal Appeal deserves to be condoned.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent – accused has strongly objected to condone the delay. He has submitted that there is no
R/CR.MA/5417/2026(GJHC240155212026) ORDER DATED: 08/09/2026 satisfactorily explained the delay caused in filing the Criminal Appeal and the application for condonation of delay may be rejected.
5. Considering the averments and explanation given in the application and hearing the learned counsel for the respective parties, this Court finds that the sufficient cause is made out to condone the delay.
6. In view of the above, the delay occurred in filing the Criminal Appeal is condoned. The application stands disposed of accordingly. Rule made absolute. (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J) V.R. PANCHAL
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: VIJAYKUMAR RAMESHBHAI PANCHAL(HC00171), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 08/09/2026 15:30:18