Gujarat High Court
FA/4800/2023 of JAYSHRIBEN PRAKASHBHAI DONGA D/O MULJIBHAI BUSA Vs PRAKASHBHAI DHIRUBHAI DONGA on 1 September 2026
01/09/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4800 of 2023 ========================================================== JAYSHRIBEN PRAKASHBHAI DONGA D/O MULJIBHAI BUSA Versus PRAKASHBHAI DHIRUBHAI DONGA ==========================================================
C/FA/4800/2023(GJHC240750502023) ORDER DATED: 01/09/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/FIRST APPEAL NO. 4800 of 2023
==========================================================
JAYSHRIBEN PRAKASHBHAI DONGA D/O MULJIBHAI BUSA
Versus
PRAKASHBHAI DHIRUBHAI DONGA
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR NILESH R KOYANI(5129) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR PREMAL R JOSHI(1327) for the Appellant(s) No. 1
MR MEET D PANSURIA(10170) for the Defendant(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE R. T. VACHHANI
Date : 01/09/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ILESH J. VORA)
1. We have heard learned counsel Mr. Premal Joshi and Mr. Meet Pansuria for the respective parties.
2. The appellant – Jayshreeben Prakashbhai remained present through virtual mode. She made a statement that having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, more particularly, for the welfare and best interest of her son, she does not press this appeal and seeks permission to withdraw unconditionally.
3. Learned counsel Mr. Premal Joshi, inviting our attention to the order dated 19.10.2023 to contend that the mother – appellant was having visitation right as per para-13 of the Deed of Divorce Agreement Exh. 24 and on that basis, she would be entitled to meet her son.
C/FA/4800/2023(GJHC240750502023) ORDER DATED: 01/09/2026
4. Learned counsel Mr. Pansuria on the aspect of visitation right fairly stated that the respondent would abide by the terms and condition of the Deed of Divorce Agreement and the husband respondent shall ensure about the compliance of the visitation right.
5. With the aforesaid observation, the Appeal stands disposed of as withdrawn. However, it is needless to say that the liberty is reserved in favour of the appellant to move before the Family Court to claim the custody of the son on change of fact situation as well as for modification of the visitation right. Whenever, such application is filed, the Family Court shall have to decide the application independently on its own merits without considering the order passed by the Family Court dated 19.10.2023 as well as the act of withdrawal of this Appeal. (ILESH J. VORA,J) (R. T. VACHHANI, J) P.S. JOSHI
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: PALLAV SUBHASHCHANDRA JOSHI(HC00177), Principal Pvt. Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 01/09/2026 17:55:14