Gujarat High Court

CR.RA/31/2019 of PRAVINBHAI GANDABHAI ALGOTAR Vs DASHRATSINH MANGALSINH PARMAR on 21 August 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

21/08/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION - NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 31 of 2019 ========================================================== PRAVINBHAI GANDABHAI ALGOTAR Versus DASHRATSINH MANGALSINH PARMAR & ANR.

R/CR.RA/31/2019(GJHC240026882019) ORDER DATED: 21/08/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST CONVICTION - NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT) NO. 31 of 2019

==========================================================

PRAVINBHAI GANDABHAI ALGOTAR

Versus

DASHRATSINH MANGALSINH PARMAR & ANR.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MOHITSINH A. JADEJA FOR MR LAXMANSINH M ZALA(5787) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR.AMIT R JOSHI(6682) for the Respondent(s) No. 1

MS JYOTI BHATT ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 2

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT M.

PRACHCHHAK

Date : 21/08/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Mr.Mohitsinh Jadeja, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. Laxmansinh Zala, learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the respondent-original complainant has already received the money and the adavit to that e ect is also produced on record, therefore, in view of that, the present Revision Application does not survive and they do not wish to proceed further with the matter. Hence, in view of the settlement arrived at between the parties, Mr. Jadeja, learned counsel seeks permission to withdraw the Revision Application. The respondent-original complainant has remained present through virtual mode and stated that he has already received the money and therefore, he does not wish to proceed further with the matter.

R/CR.RA/31/2019(GJHC240026882019) ORDER DATED: 21/08/2026 In view of the above circumstances, permission as sought for is granted. The Revision Application stands disposed of as withdrawn. Rule is discharged. The amount, if any, which is lying before the (rst Appellate Court i.e. concerned Sessions Court, shall be refunded to the present petitioner. (HEMANT M. PRACHCHHAK,J) ANUSRI

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: ANUSRI VASU(HC02352), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 25/08/2026 18:52:11

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead