Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/9247/2026 of ZALA NIRMALSINH DASHRATHSINH Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 22 July 2026
22/07/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (HABEAS CORPUS) NO. 9247 of 2026 ========================================================== ZALA NIRMALSINH DASHRATHSINH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
R/SCR.A/9247/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/07/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (HABEAS CORPUS) NO. 9247 of
==========================================================
ZALA NIRMALSINH DASHRATHSINH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MS KINJAL PATEL for MR VAIBHAV N SHETH(5337) for the Applicant(s) No.
MR IRFAN H SAIYED for the Respondent(s) No. 8,9
MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
and
HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA
Date : 22/07/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI)
1. Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.
2. The Police Inspector, Himmatnagar “A” Division Police Station has produced a report along with the Corpus who has completed 18 years of age, which is taken on record. The birth date is verified as 26.5.2008 from the school leaving certificate as well as Aadhar Card. She is accompanied by her parents i.e. respondent no.8–Prakashsinh Dilipsinh Parmar and respondent no.9–Rupalben Prakashsinh Parmar. The petitioner is present who stated that he had performed the marriage by following Saptapadi rites and when about to go for the registration of the marriage, the parents took the Corpus away.
R/SCR.A/9247/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/07/2026
3. Today, when we talked with the Corpus in the chamber, she expressed that she had willingly performed the marriage rites and she affirms of Saptapadi ceremony with the petitioner and thus, shown willingness to join the petitioner.
4. We inquired from the petitioner who states that he as well as Corpus both are earning and he is also having an agricultural land. The petitioner states that the marriage ceremony was performed in presence of his relatives.
5. Both the parents of the Corpus were also appraised in the chamber the desire of their daughter to join the petitioner who stated that she has married the petitioner. The parents are represented by learned advocate Mr. Irfan Saiyed who is permitted to file Vakalatnama.
6. Since both have married and are willing couple and the Corpus has expressed her desire to join the petitioner at the free will. The Corpus who has attained majority is married wife of the petitioner is free to take her own decision and thus, the present application is ALLOWED. (GITA GOPI,J) (L. S. PIRZADA, J) Maulik
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: MAULIK RAJESH PANDYA(HC00205), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 22/07/2026 14:57:43