Gujarat High Court

SCR.A/10448/2026 of NITYAM HITENDRAKUMAR DESAI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 21 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

21/07/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (HABEAS CORPUS) NO. 10448 of 2026 ========================================================== NITYAM HITENDRAKUMAR DESAI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

R/SCR.A/10448/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/07/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (HABEAS CORPUS) NO. 10448 of

==========================================================

NITYAM HITENDRAKUMAR DESAI

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR JAYDEEP H SINDHI(9585) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

and

HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE L. S. PIRZADA

Date : 21/07/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

(PER : HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI)

1. The Corpus is produced by the Police Sub-Inspector, Chandkheda Police Station, Ahmedabad City, who stated that the Corpus is 25 years of age. She was staying in live-in relationship with the applicant. The report of Chandkheda Police Station suggests that the Corpus was having her job in Supplycopiya Private Limited Company in Money Plant Heights at Jagatpur, Ahmedabad City and the applicant and the Corpus had met at Modasa and she has been residing with the applicant under the Maitri Karar executed on 6.7.2026 before the Notary, Modasa.

2. The police report is also accompanied by the statement of the father – Bharatbhai Vaghjibhai Patel dated 21.7.2026 and the

R/SCR.A/10448/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/07/2026 father has also affirmed her job at Ahmedabad City in Supplycopiya Private Limited Company and the father wanted the Corpus to get married in the community, but she has refused urging that she wanted to stay along with the applicant. The father has expressed his consent for the Corpus to join the applicant. Let the report of the police, statement of the father along with the statement of the Corpus be taken on record.

3. The applicant is present before this Court along with his advocate. The applicant is aged about 25 years and he expressed his desire to enter into marriage with the Corpus by performing the rites and rituals.

4. Having considered the desire of the Corpus to join the applicant and in view of the fact that now since the father has also given his consent, there remains no grievance.

5. Hence, the present application is allowed. The Corpus is permitted to join the applicant.

(GITA GOPI,J) (L. S. PIRZADA, J) Maulik

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judges. Digitally signed by: MAULIK RAJESH PANDYA(HC00205), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 21/07/2026 16:48:56

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead