Gujarat High Court

CR.MA/4337/2023 of PRADIP KUMAR VAISHNAV DAS KAPOOR Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 6 July 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

06/07/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 4337 of 2023 ================================================ PRADIP KUMAR VAISHNAV DAS KAPOOR Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ================================================ Appearance: MR

R/CR.MA/4337/2023 ORDER DATED: 06/07/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (DIRECTION) NO. 4337

of 2023

================================================

PRADIP KUMAR VAISHNAV DAS KAPOOR

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

================================================

Appearance:

MR NISHITH P THAKKAR(2836) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MS ASHA D TIWARI(2983) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Date : 06/07/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. Record reveals that on 08.11.2023, when the matter was taken up by the coordinate Bench, learned advocate for the applicant was not present. By the said order, the coordinate Bench Bench directed to take on record the Report forwarded by the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Ahmedabad (Rural) of learned 3rd Additional Senior Civil Judge and Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Ahmedabad (Rural) and produced by the Registry.

2. From a perusal of the said Report, it reveals that the learned

R/CR.MA/4337/2023 ORDER DATED: 06/07/2026 Magistrate had already sent a Notice dated 04.11.2023 to the complainant – applicant herein informing to remain present before the Court on 06.11.2023 with all the documents relating to the case, however, the complainant did not turn up before the Court nor submitted any papers for reconstruction.

3. Today also, when the matter is called out, the learned advocate for the applicant – complainant is not present.

4. The matter is of 2023 and pending since then for necessary direction.

5. In the given facts and circumstances of the case, this application is being disposed of reserving liberty in favour of the complainant – applicant herein to prefer appropriate application before the trial Court concerned for reconstruction and to cooperate in the same. 5.1 The application stands disposed of, accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/5tss6726

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/07/2026 13:51:25

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead