Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/11249/2026 of MOHAMMAD AASIF ABDUL RASID SHIKH Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 7 May 2026
07/05/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 11249 of 2026 ================================================ MOHAMMAD AASIF ABDUL RASID SHIKH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR. ================================================
R/CR.MA/11249/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/05/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY
BAIL) NO. 11249 of 2026
================================================
MOHAMMAD AASIF ABDUL RASID SHIKH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
================================================
Appearance:
PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR BHARGAV PANDYA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 07/05/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service.
2. This application is filed by the applicant seeking temporary bail for 20 days on the ground of marriage of his niece – his brother’s daughter.
3. Heard, party-in-person appearing for the applicant and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.
4. Having heard and considering the papers available on
R/CR.MA/11249/2026 ORDER DATED: 07/05/2026 record, it appears that the applicant is an Under Trial Prisoner for an offence under the NDPS Act, allegedly, involving commercial quantity of 352.070 gram of Mephedrone drugs. It further appears that the applicant is a permanent resident of Uttar Pradesh and at the time of offence, he was residing at Surat and that, he is required to attend the marriage at Mumbai. Considering the said aspects, this Court is not inclined to exercise discretion. The application is rejected, accordingly. Rule is discharged. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/SB/1/4tss7526
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 07/05/2026 14:04:10