Gujarat High Court

CR.RA/160/2025 of JAGDISHBHAI PARTHIBHAI BAROT Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 27 April 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

27/04/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 160 of 2025 ========================================================== JAGDISHBHAI PARTHIBHAI BAROT Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

R/CR.RA/160/2025 ORDER DATED: 27/04/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST ACQUITTAL) NO. 160

of 2025

==========================================================

JAGDISHBHAI PARTHIBHAI BAROT

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR HIMANSU M PADHYA(1611) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR PRANAV DHAGAT APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

Date : 27/04/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

1. The accused came to be acquitted by an order dated 23.07.2024 passed by the learned 6th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Palanpur at Banaskantha for the offences under Sections 279, 304A, 337, 338 of the Indian Penal Code (for short, ‘I.P.C’) and Sections 177, 184, 134 of the Motor Vehicles Act.

2. Aggrieved by the said order of acquittal, the complainant – Jagdishbhai Parthibhai Barot filed a Criminal Appeal No.335 of 2024 before the learned 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Palanpur and the appellate Court while dismissing the appeal had affirmed the order passed by the learned 6th Additional Judicial Magistrate First Class, Palanpur at Banaskantha acquitting the accused. Aggrieved by the order, the complainant is in the revisional jurisdiction under Section 442

R/CR.RA/160/2025 ORDER DATED: 27/04/2026 read with Section 438 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short, ‘BNSS Act’).

3. Under Section 442 of the BNSS Act, the High Court’s power of revision has been notified. Sub-section (3) of Section 442 of the BNSS Act reads as under: “(3) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to authorise a High Court to convert a finding of acquittal into one of conviction.”

4. Thus, Sub-section (3) of Section 442 of the BNSS Act restricts the revisional power of the High Court to convert a finding of the acquittal into conviction.

5. Hence, the present revision application against acquittal stands rejected. (GITA GOPI,J) PARMAR KRISH/47

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: PARMAR KRISH(HC02348), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 27/04/2026 17:26:24

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead