Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/9080/2026 of PARIKH SANDEEPKUMAR NAVINCHANDRA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 21 April 2026
21/04/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 9080 of 2026 ========================================================== PARIKH SANDEEPKUMAR NAVINCHANDRA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT
R/CR.MA/9080/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR ANTICIPATORY BAIL) NO. 9080
of 2026
==========================================================
PARIKH SANDEEPKUMAR NAVINCHANDRA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR ADITYA B GANDHI(13129) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR.KARNA H DHOMSE(6684) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MS SHREYA M SONI(10618) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR. ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 21/04/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
3
Decisions referred to
In this index
3
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. By way of the present application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”), the applicant has prayed for anticipatory bail in the event of arrest in connection with the FIR being I-CR No. 11217020260059 of 2026 registered with “B” Division Patan City Police Station, District: Patan, for the offences punishable under Sections 316(2) and 54 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.
2. At the outset, the learned advocate for the applicant would submit that the offences alleged in the impugned FIR are the one in which maximum punishment prescribed for is upto 7 years. Accordingly, on instructions, he states that the applicant is ready and willing to join the investigation and will appear before the investigating officer as per direction of this Court.
R/CR.MA/9080/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026
3. Considering the above, the applicant is hereby directed to remain present before the Investigating Officer concerned on 28.04.2026 and co-operate with the investigation and if at all the Investigating Officer deems it fit to arrest the applicant, a 7 days’ prior notice shall be given to him. Further, the Investigating Officer is directed to scrupulously follow the proposition of law as settled by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the cases of Arnesh Kumar v. State of Bihar, reported in (2014) 8 SCC 273, Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation & Anr., reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51 and in Md. Asfak Alam v. State of Jharkhand & Anr., reported in 2023 SCC OnLine SC 892 and also inform about the grounds of arrest, if needed, to learned Magistrate and even the learned Magistrate before mechanically authorizing the detention of the applicant, shall follow the dictum of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the aforesaid decisions.
4. With aforesaid directions, this application stands disposed of. Direct service is permitted. (P. M. RAVAL, J) NITIN MAKWANA
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: NITIN INDRAVADAN MAKWANA(HCW0110), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 21/04/2026 15:04:43