Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/9145/2026 of SALMABANU MUSTAQBHAI MANSURI AND D/O HANIFBHAI MANSURI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 21 April 2026
21/04/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 9145 of 2026 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/13664/2026 ================================================================ SALMABANU MUSTAQBHAI MANSURI AND D/O HANIFBHAI MANSURI
R/CR.MA/9145/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
In
F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/13664/2026
================================================================
SALMABANU MUSTAQBHAI MANSURI AND D/O HANIFBHAI MANSURI &
ORS.
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
================================================================
Appearance:
JIGNESHKUMAR P PANDAV(8297) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2,3
MR ROHAN H RAVAL, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI
Date : 21/04/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER
1. Heard the learned advocates appearing for the respective parties.
2. By way of this application, the applicants have prayed for condonation of delay of 2 days occurred in preferring the application.
3. Learned advocate for the applicants submits that the applicant No.1-mother had to take of the minor children. In addition, the family was facing a 昀椀nancial crunch and hence, the applicant No.1 could not approach an advocate to take the legal recourse in time and all these factors have contributed to the above delay.
R/CR.MA/9145/2026 ORDER DATED: 21/04/2026
4. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent– State submits that the delay in 昀椀ling the application is not su昀케ciently explained and therefore, the present application may be rejected.
5. Considering the averments made in the application and as the delay is su昀케ciently explained, the delay of 2 days occurred in 昀椀ling the application deserves to be condoned and is hereby condoned.
6. Accordingly, the present application is allowed.
7. Let the Criminal Revision Application be listed in due course. Sd/- (GITA GOPI, J) CAROLINE
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212), Principal pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 21/04/2026 17:09:52