Gujarat High Court
SCR.A/4233/2026 of RAJESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI SAROLA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 2 April 2026
02/04/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (FURLOUGH LEAVE) NO. 4233 of 2026 ================================================ RAJESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI SAROLA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS. ================================================ Appearance:
R/SCR.A/4233/2026 ORDER DATED: 02/04/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/SPECIAL CRIMINAL APPLICATION (FURLOUGH LEAVE)
NO. 4233 of 2026
================================================
RAJESHBHAI RAMESHBHAI SAROLA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
================================================
Appearance:
THROUGH JAIL for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 02/04/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. This petition is filed by the petitioner, through jail, seeking furlough leave on the ground that his furlough leave has been rejected by the competent authority.
2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service on behalf of the respondent – State.
3. Having heard the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State and perusing the jail remarks, it appears that the petitioner is recently convicted for the offence punishable under Section 302 etc. of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) on 01.10.2025.
R/SCR.A/4233/2026 ORDER DATED: 02/04/2026 Further, earlier when he was released on temporary bail, twice he absconded for 274 and 302 days, respectively, and could be lodged back only by the police. Moreover, his conduct in jail is also not satisfactory. Therefore, the Court is not inclined to exercise discretion.
4. The petition, therefore, fails and is rejected, accordingly. Rule is discharged. 4.1 Registry to communicate this order to the concerned jail authority, forthwith. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/19tss2426
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 02/04/2026 14:18:55