Gujarat High Court

CR.RA/1831/2024 of MAHEMUDABEN W/O RAFIQ HASANBHAI GHOGHARI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 20 March 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

20/03/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST ORDER PASSED BY SUBORDINATE COURT) NO. 1831 of 2024 ========================================================== MAHEMUDABEN W/O RAFIQ HASANBHAI GHOGHARI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT

R/CR.RA/1831/2024 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION (AGAINST ORDER PASSED BY

SUBORDINATE COURT) NO. 1831 of 2024

==========================================================

MAHEMUDABEN W/O RAFIQ HASANBHAI GHOGHARI

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR MAULIK M SONI(7249) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MS JYOTI BHATT, ADDITIONAL PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for the Respondent(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MS. JUSTICE GITA GOPI

Date : 20/03/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. Learned advocate for the applicant Mr. Maulik Soni submits that there is no case against the present applicant even to frame the charge.

2. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor submits that it is a case of double murder.

3. Having heard learned advocates for the respective parties, this Court does not %nd any reason to entertain the present application. However, it is directed to the learned trial Court Judge to consider the provision of Section 249 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, and the learned trial Court Judge is thus

R/CR.RA/1831/2024 ORDER DATED: 20/03/2026 directed to hear the learned Public Prosecutor with regard to opening of case in con%rmity under Section 249 of BNSS to describe the charge brought against the accused stating by what evidence, prosecution proposes to prove the guilt of the accused. The learned trial Court Judge would also give equal opportunity to the accused for hearing of the matter.

4. With the above observations, the matter stands disposed of as dismissed. Sd/- (GITA GOPI, J) CAROLINE / DB 37

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: CAROLINE ANTHONISWAMY(HC00212), Principal pvt Secretary, at High Court of Gujarat on 20/03/2026 16:28:56

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead