Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/5820/2026 of MOHSIN URFE PITA RAMZANBHAI BHIKHUBHAI CHAUHAN THRO ASMABANU NAVED SHAIKH Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 12 March 2026
12/03/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL) NO. 5820 of 2026 ================================================ MOHSIN URFE PITA RAMZANBHAI BHIKHUBHAI CHAUHAN THRO ASMABANU NAVED SHAIKH Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR TEMPORARY BAIL)
NO. 5820 of 2026
================================================
MOHSIN URFE PITA RAMZANBHAI BHIKHUBHAI
CHAUHAN THRO ASMABANU NAVED SHAIKH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
================================================
Appearance:
PARTY IN PERSON(5000) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR CHINTAN DAVE, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 12/03/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Present application has been filed by the applicant through his wife seeking temporary bail for 30 days on the ground of her medical treatment.
2. Rule. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service of notice of rule on behalf of the respondent – State.
3. Having heard the wife of the applicant who appeared in person and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, as also considering the record, it appears that the applicant had preferred an application for temporary bail before the Sessions Court concerned and by an order dated 19.01.2026 passed in Criminal Misc. Application No. 31 of 2026, the said application came to be allowed in part, wherein, one of the conditions imposed was to deposit Rs.1 lakh, which would be returned to the applicant on his surrendering back. The wife of the applicant has stated that in view of the financial condition, the applicant is not in a position to deposit such an amount and accordingly, she urges that such amount may be reduced suitably.
4. In aforesaid view of the matter, in the considered opinion of the Court, interest of justice would be served if the aforesaid amount is reduced considering the ground for temporary bail as well as the financial condition of the applicant.
5. Accordingly, this application is allowed in part. The applicant is ordered to be released on temporary bail for a period of 10 days from the date of his actual release on the conditions that are imposed vide above-referred order dated 19.01.2026 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, however, the amount to be deposited by the applicant is reduced to Rs.50,000/-. The applicant shall surrender to the jail authority on expiry of the temporary bail period forthwith. 5.1 Rule is made absolute accordingly.
5.2 Registry to communicate this order to the jail authority concerned, forthwith. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/DB/4tss12326
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 12/03/2026 14:02:40