Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/25267/2025 of VIDHYABEN GIRISHBHAI SOLANKI Vs GIRISHBHAI RAMANBHAI SOLANKI on 6 March 2026
06/03/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 25267 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/47452/2025 ========================================================== VIDHYABEN GIRISHBHAI SOLANKI & ANR. Versus GIRISHBHAI
R/CR.MA/25267/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/03/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.
25267 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/47452/2025
==========================================================
VIDHYABEN GIRISHBHAI SOLANKI & ANR.
Versus
GIRISHBHAI RAMANBHAI SOLANKI & ANR.
==========================================================
Appearance:
MR BHARGAV P DANGAR(10685) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
MR.HITENDRA D RAJPUT(7224) for the Applicant(s) No. 1,2
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 1
ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 2
==========================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 06/03/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. On the last occasion, i.e. 17.02.2026, learned advocate Mr. Chirag Brahmbhatt informed the Court that he had instructions to appear on behalf of Respondent No.1 and that he would be filing his Vakalatnama. However, when the matter is called out today, the board does not reflect his name. Neither the learned advocate nor the respondent Mr. Girishbhai is present before the Court.
2. Heard learned advocate for the applicant.
3. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 39 days caused in filing the captioned revision application.
R/CR.MA/25267/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/03/2026 3.1 Rule. Learned APP waives service of rule on behalf of the respondent - State.
4. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. (P. M. RAVAL, J) MOHD SAIF ULLAH
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: MOHD SAIF ULLAH(HC02372), ENGLISH STENO GRADE-II\, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/03/2026 15:00:59