Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/297/2025 of JAGDISHBHAI MULJIBHAI KORADIYA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 20 February 2026
20/02/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 297 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/45/2025 ================================================ JAGDISHBHAI MULJIBHAI KORADIYA Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
R/CR.MA/297/2025 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION
OF DELAY) NO. 297 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/45/2025
================================================
JAGDISHBHAI MULJIBHAI KORADIYA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
================================================
Appearance:
MR DARSHIT H RAVAL(11887) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
HCLS COMMITTEE(4998) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MS NILAM N CHAUHAN(6635) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
NOTICE SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 3
MR PRANAV DHAGAT, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 20/02/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 111 days caused in filing the captioned revision application.
2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates for the respective respondents waive service.
3. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties
R/CR.MA/297/2025 ORDER DATED: 20/02/2026 present. 3.1 The learned advocate for the applicant, drawing attention of the Court to the grounds for delay narrated in the application memo, states that sufficient cause has been made out for condonation of delay and accordingly, it is urged that the delay that has caused in filing the revision application, may be condoned, to which, the learned advocate for the respondent No. 2 has vehemently opposed, stating that no sufficient cause has been shown to condone the delay and accordingly, it is requested to reject the application.
4. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/DB/1/5tss20226
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 20/02/2026 14:17:31