Gujarat High Court

CR.MA/26749/2025 of CBI, BSFB, MUMBAI Vs SH BHARAT PRUSHOTTAM GAJJAR on 13 February 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

13/02/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 26749 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/50803/2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/26888/2025 ========================================================== CBI, BSFB, MUMBAI

R/CR.MA/26749/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.

26749 of 2025

In F/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION/50803/2025

In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/26888/2025

==========================================================

CBI, BSFB, MUMBAI

Versus

SH BHARAT PRUSHOTTAM GAJJAR & ORS.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MR RC KODEKAR(1395) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 3

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Date : 13/02/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 75 days caused in preferring the restoration application in main Criminal Revision Application which came to be dismissed for default for want of prosecution, for non-removing the o&ce objection. As this is an application for condonation of delay in restoration application, no notice is issued to the respondent nos.1 & 2.

2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned APP waives service of Rule.

3. Heard, the learned advocate for applicant. The learned advocate for the applicant, drawing attention of the Court to

R/CR.MA/26749/2025 ORDER DATED: 13/02/2026 the grounds for delay narrated in the application memo, states that su&cient cause has been made out for condonation of delay and accordingly, it is urged that the delay that has caused in preferring the restoration application in main Criminal Revision Application, may be condoned.

4. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the restoration application in main Criminal Revision Application has been su&ciently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in 0ling the restoration application in main Criminal Revision Application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. (P. M. RAVAL, J) AMIT ITALIAN

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: AMIT DAHYABHAI ITALIAN(HCW0112), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE I, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/02/2026 17:13:42

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead