Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/1481/2026 of KANTIBHAI KHIMJIBHAI KARGATHIYA Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 22 January 2026
22/01/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 1481 of 2026 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/1659/2026 With R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 1485 of 2026 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 2382 of 2026
R/CR.MA/1481/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION
OF DELAY) NO. 1481 of 2026
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/1659/2026
With
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION NO. 1485 of 2026
In
F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 2382 of 2026
=================================================
KANTIBHAI KHIMJIBHAI KARGATHIYA
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
=================================================
Appearance:
MR P S DATTA(11324) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN RAVAL, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 22/01/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. By these applications under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 183 and 179 days respectively, caused in filing the captioned revision applications.
2. Learned advocate Mr. Kushal A. Desai appears and states that he has instructions to appear on behalf of respondent No. 2 – original complainant. He shall file his Vakalatnama before the registry,
R/CR.MA/1481/2026 ORDER DATED: 22/01/2026 which the registry shall accept.
3. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates for the respective respondents waive service.
4. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties. The learned advocate for the applicant, while drawing attention of the Court to the grounds for delay, stated that the matter is amicably settled between the parties, to which assertion, the learned advocate for the respondent No. 2 has fairly conceded to. Accordingly, it is urged that delay caused in preferring the revision applications may be condoned.
5. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of applications, and the fact that the matter is settled between the parties, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision applications has been sufficiently explained. The applications, therefore, succeed and are, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision applications is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/3-4tss22126
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 22/01/2026 14:32:01