Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/25932/2025 of GROWW INVEST TECH PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH SANJEET VIKRAM SINGH Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 16 January 2026
16/01/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 25932 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/49045/2025 ================================================= GROWW INVEST TECH PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH SANJEET VIKRAM SINGH Versus
R/CR.MA/25932/2025 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION
OF DELAY) NO. 25932 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/49045/2025
=================================================
GROWW INVEST TECH PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH
SANJEET VIKRAM SINGH
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ORS.
=================================================
Appearance:
MR JOGENDER U SINGH(5409) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR YOGESH K MANGHANI(13921) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
PRERAK P OZA(8279) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
NOTICE THROUGH SPEED POST SERVED for the Respondent(s) No. 2,3,4
MR ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 16/01/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned advocate Mr. P. M. Dave states that he has instructions to appear on behalf of the respondent No. 3 and will file his appearance before the registry. Registry shall accept the same.
2. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 10 days caused in filing the
R/CR.MA/25932/2025 ORDER DATED: 16/01/2026 captioned revision application.
3. Though notice is served, none appears for the respondent Nos. 2 and 4.
4. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned Additional Public Prosecutor waives service for the respondent – State.
5. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties present.
6. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/DB-I-5tss16126
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 16/01/2026 15:17:28