Gujarat High Court

CR.MA/12421/2019 of CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THRO ASHOK NANA GHUGE Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 13 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

13/01/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 12421 of 2019 In R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/761/2019 ================================================= CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THRO ASHOK NANA GHUGE Versus STATE OF

R/CR.MA/12421/2019 ORDER DATED: 13/01/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION

OF DELAY) NO. 12421 of 2019

In R/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/761/2019

=================================================

CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION THRO ASHOK

NANA GHUGE

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

=================================================

Appearance:

MR RC KODEKAR(1395) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

MR MB GOHIL(2702) for the Respondent(s) No. 2

MR NS TAHILRAMANI(2576) for the Respondent(s) No. 2

MR UTKARSH SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1,2

=================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Date : 13/01/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 237 days caused in filing the captioned revision application.

2. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties present.

3. Having heard and considering the averments made in the

R/CR.MA/12421/2019 ORDER DATED: 13/01/2026 memorandum of application, more particularly, the fact that the applicant did not remain indolent and has taken steps to challenge the order impugned in the revision application, and that, as the documents were to be forwarded to Mumbai and the time taken in following the procedure as detailed in the application memo, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/DB-II-2tss13126

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 13/01/2026 15:30:33

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead