Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/21944/2025 of DINESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI MALAKIYA Vs RAJSHRIBEN DINESHBHAI MALAKIYA on 9 January 2026
09/01/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 21944 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/33239/2025 ================================================= DINESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI MALAKIYA Versus RAJSHRIBEN DINESHBHAI MALAKIYA
R/CR.MA/21944/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION
OF DELAY) NO. 21944 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/33239/2025
=================================================
DINESHBHAI NARSHIBHAI MALAKIYA
Versus
RAJSHRIBEN DINESHBHAI MALAKIYA & ORS.
=================================================
Appearance:
MR.MRUDUL M BAROT(3750) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR ROHAN SHAH, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 4
=================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 09/01/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. Learned advocate Mr. Krunal Shah has instructions to appear for respondent Nos. 1 to 3. He shall file his appearance in due Course, which the registry shall accept.
2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates for the respective respondents waive service.
3. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 75 days caused in filing the
R/CR.MA/21944/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/01/2026 captioned revision application.
4. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties.
5. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/43tss9126
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/01/2026 14:25:48