Gujarat High Court

CR.MA/27389/2025 of MAHINDRA @MAHESH MELABHAI CHAUHAN Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 9 January 2026

Cites 0, Cited by 0

09/01/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 27389 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/51005/2025 ========================================================== MAHINDRA @MAHESH MELABHAI CHAUHAN Versus STATE OF GUJARAT

R/CR.MA/27389/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/01/2026

IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD

R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO.

27389 of 2025

In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/51005/2025

==========================================================

MAHINDRA @MAHESH MELABHAI CHAUHAN

Versus

STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.

==========================================================

Appearance:

MS. PARUL VANZARA(14228) for the Applicant(s) No. 1

ROHAN SHAH APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1

==========================================================

CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL

Date : 09/01/2026

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay caused in filing the captioned revision application.

2. Pursuant to service of notice, learned advocate Jignesh Lambha appears for the respondent 2 – original complainant. He states that he will file his Vakalatnama before the registry in due course. Registry to accept the same. 2.1 Rule. Learned advocates for the respective respondents waive service.

3. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, the Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision

R/CR.MA/27389/2025 ORDER DATED: 09/01/2026 application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. (P. M. RAVAL, J) MMP

Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: MAHENDRA MOHANBHAI PUROHIT(HCD0074), ENGLISH STENOGRAPHER GRADE TWO CLASS TWO, at High Court of Gujarat on 09/01/2026 14:02:56

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead