Gujarat High Court
CR.MA/17117/2025 of HARESHBHAI SHANKARLAL MURJANI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 6 January 2026
06/01/2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION OF DELAY) NO. 17117 of 2025 In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/32433/2025 ================================================= HARESHBHAI SHANKARLAL MURJANI Versus STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
R/CR.MA/17117/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/01/2026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
R/CRIMINAL MISC.APPLICATION (FOR CONDONATION
OF DELAY) NO. 17117 of 2025
In F/CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION/32433/2025
=================================================
HARESHBHAI SHANKARLAL MURJANI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT & ANR.
=================================================
Appearance:
MR. SHIVAM N THAKKAR(10024) for the Applicant(s) No. 1
MR TUSHAR CHAUDHARY(5316) for the Respondent(s) No. 2
MR UTKARSH SHARMA, APP for the Respondent(s) No. 1
=================================================
CORAM:HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P. M. RAVAL
Date : 06/01/2026
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
1. By this application under section 5 of the Limitation Act, the applicant seeks condonation of delay of 193 days caused in filing the captioned revision application.
2. Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates for the respective respondents waive service.
3. Heard, the learned advocates for the respective parties present.
R/CR.MA/17117/2025 ORDER DATED: 06/01/2026 3.1 The learned advocate for the applicant took this Court through the averments made in this application and stated that sufficient cause is made out for condonation of delay and accordingly, it is urged that delay may be condoned, to which, learned advocate Mr. Chaudhary for the respondent No. 2 vehemently objected to contending that no sufficient cause is shown to condone the delay and he, eventually, urged to reject the application.
4. Having heard and considering the averments made in the memorandum of application, this Court is of the view that the delay that has occasioned in preferring the revision application has been sufficiently explained. The application, therefore, succeeds and is, accordingly, allowed. The delay caused in filing the revision application is hereby condoned. Rule is made absolute accordingly. [ P. M. Raval, J. ] hiren/DB-85tss6126
Original copy of this order has been signed by the Hon'ble Judge. Digitally signed by: HIREN VIRENDRABHAI MER(HC00351), PRINCIPAL PRIVATE SECRETARY, at High Court of Gujarat on 06/01/2026 17:04:50